Index
Page 4 of 5
Left 4 Dead
EVGA GTX 295+ keeps its rightful lead, and although HD 4870 X2 bounces back occasionally, it's not enough to beat the new champ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb5a1/cb5a10732c06418659447f761fedbdcf8f11fb6f" alt="Image Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7150/e7150be332e899e2fc4b5bb3fd325259368c9f31" alt="Image Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7862d/7862d0b427d9751b737a0cd3336334bd1c496918" alt="Image Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16d88/16d88739e0492718a658e4c12b2a3e0c7c82c9c3" alt="Image Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77fe1/77fe127d522fa91522bfbabbe7678a26a0bb914b" alt="Image Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca5de/ca5de93a2cc222835428b9fed61423e92bb67b84" alt="Image Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6319f/6319f1faf51f49f02d8708558bf5989fd3488087" alt="Image Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e672/1e672677ecb45f44463a5d64f88d2f240e762d67" alt="Image Image"
GTX 295 continues its spell of dominance in this test, but we recorded the lowest performance difference at 1680x1500 and 4xAA 8xAF - only 0.5%. At 1920x1200 however, Nvidia again gains ground and beats ATI by 9%. At 2560x1600, the GTX 295 is faster by 4.5%, whereas turning on 4xAA and 8xAF results in GTX being faster by 18%.
Dead Space
This is the game where HD 4870 X2 takes the worst beating of all during our testing, ranging from EVGA's already impressive 58% advantage to almost unbelievable 78%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/daa11/daa118999b78f117e153c942e1c3c8ce44efa66a" alt="Image Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffe66/ffe669b8b48caab60e87f4f3c486b50ae08efe8f" alt="Image Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e29b/7e29bc4c24eb432b3f4e151a5ba8586f8de2ca93" alt="Image Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1ad2/d1ad2d0bb81447ff11a9aa216f6780086a7a00d5" alt="Image Image"
At 1920x1200, EVGA's GTX 295+ humiliates the HD 4870 X2 by beating it by 58%, whereas the reference GTX 295 lags behind the EVGA's card by only 1%. AA doesn't change the scores, except for extending EVGA's lead over the reference card to 2%.
2560x1600 is a test that HD 4870 X2 will surely want to forget soon as it looses to EVGA's GTX 295+ by impressive 72%. Turning AA on decreases EVGA's advantage to 63% whereas the reference GTX 295 lags behind its overclocked version by 4% in both scenarios.
World in Conflict
World in Conflict isn't making things any easier for ATI, as GTX 295+ keeps marching on the throne.
At 1920x1200, 295 and 295+ run on par but beat the HD 4870 X2 by as much as 24%, and the margin stays the same after we turned on 4xAA and 16xAF filters. At 2560x1600, EVGA 295+ separates itself from the pack by beating the reference version by 5% and extends the lead over the HD 4870 X2 to 26%. The same scenario occurs when we turn on 4xAA and 16xAF, except that the reference GTX 295 narrows the performance gap to 2%.